<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>September on The Field Blog</title><link>https://thefield.blog/essays/2025/09/</link><description>Recent content in September on The Field Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-in</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thefield.blog/essays/2025/09/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Age verification is not privacy-preserving</title><link>https://thefield.blog/essays/age-verification-is-not-privacy-preserving/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 10:00:00 +0530</pubDate><guid>https://thefield.blog/essays/age-verification-is-not-privacy-preserving/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Governments and regulators, even those who have long supported and encouraged better privacy for digital users, are now pushing for online age verification. In a world that has given businesses an open hand for decades in targeting minors for advertising, they now want to protect them from adult content, gambling, and other content they deem restricted. Who controls such restrictions is itself concerning. Regardless, any age verification (online or offline) cannot be privacy-preserving.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>